Affichage des articles dont le libellé est There. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est There. Afficher tous les articles

lundi 21 octobre 2013

Mobile payments: Are we there yet? CTIA panel talks up Isis

 

The smartphone has transformed the telephone, the digital camera, the music player, the software industry, the traditional PC, and much more. But, its over-hyped efforts to revolutionize the wallet have fallen flat so far. CTIA MobileCON tackled mobile payments head-on by making it the subject of the opening keynote on Wednesday afternoon in the heart of Silicon Valley. While the panel wavered on a timeframe for mass adoption, they did talk up the new mobile wallet solution from the U.S. wireless carriers that is on the brink of a nationwide rollout.


The keynote was a panel that featured Verizon Wireless CEO Dan Mead as the moderator, along with panelits Dan Schulman from American Express, Jamba Juice CEO James White, and Michael Abbott, CEO of mobile payment company Isis. In fact, the panel turned into a bit of an Isis pitch with some general mobile payment perspective sprinkled in.


Isis is a joint venture between Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile in the U.S., and it uses NFC, a special SIM card, and the existing contactless payment terminals that many retailers have already installed. It's an effort to reduce complexity and create standards, but it's stiff facing competition from Google, Visa, PayPal, and others. In the U.S., payments is a 4 trillion dollar industry and all of the major U.S. financial institutions as well as many new entrants are positioning themselves to grab a piece of it. There's very little cooperation between competing systems. 


"The mobile phone has taken over so much," said Abbott, "but it hasn't taken over your wallet. It's a tremendous opportunity to make it happen but we've got to make it incredibly simple."


Whether Isis makes it simple enough is an open debate. It requires a high-security SIM card and it's only available on select Android devices that have NFC. Isis is working on a special sleeve for Apple iPhone users since the iPhone doesn't have NFC, but that's not a very promising option for the iOS platform that owns about half of the U.S. smartphone market. 


For mobile payments, Abbott stressed that the real competition is plastic credit cards. He said mobile payments have got to be better and simpler than credit cards so that customers say "I'll never go back to plastic." One of the killer features for doing that, he believes, is showing your real-time account balance at-a-glance before you pay. 


"It's not just a from factor change" from plastic to digital that's important, Schulman stated. It's about "redefining how people manage and move their money." He talked about how expensive it can be to be poor, where you have to operate in cash and aren't part of mainstream financial services. That's 70 million people in the United States. A lot of these folks already have smartphones and mobile payments could change the game for them.


Tapping M2M: The Internet of Things


The rise of objects that connect themselves to the internet -- from cars to heart monitors to stoplights -- is unleashing a wave of new possibilities for data gathering, predictive analytics, and IT automation. We discuss how to tap these nascent solutions.


Schulman emphasized that the Internet is a "digital tornado" that redefines business markets and creates new opportunities. That's the reason he left the mobile industry after stints at AT&T and Virgin Mobile and went to American Express, where he wants to use digital wallet technology to transform AMEX from an exclusive brand to an inclusive brand. 


"We're extremely excited to be part of this effort to democratize the management and movement of money," he said.


Isis is the solution that all of these leaders are betting on in the near term. That's no surprise since Isis is a carrier solution and all of them are Isis partners, and the CTIA itself is a carrier organization. Nevertheless, the success or failure of Isis over the next year will tell us a lot about the current state of mobile payments. The service is currently in trial in Salt Lake City, Utah and Austin, Texas, but is on track for a nationwide rollout across the U.S. by the end of 2013.


One of the key Isis retail partners is Jamba Juice, the popular juice bar and smoothie-maker. On Wednesday at MobileCON, Jamba Juice and Isis announced a Million Smoothie Giveaway in which the first million customers who use Isis Mobile Wallet to pay will receive a free smoothie. The fact that they announed this at MobileCON this week likely means that the nationwide rollout is imminent.


Jamba Juice's White stated, "We do over a 100 million transactions annually and we actually believe the digital wallets are more secure than transactions with credit cards." 


White also noted that mobile payments will allow Jamba Juice to increase customer loyalty by combining payment and loyalty cards into one system that will allow the juice bar to send special offers to its customers.


Schulman put it another way. "The holy grail is the data and information around the transaction and not the form factor change."


Some privacy-conscious consumers will be uneasy with that, and so companies will need to provide tangible value in exchange for that privacy invasion, like the way Android has done with Google Now. Speaking of Google, of course it has a horse in this race as well with Google Wallet, which is the mobile payment system that is most known to consumers.


Isis and Google Wallet look like the two horses to watch in the U.S. over the next six months. We also have to expect Apple to enter the race at some point. It's no coincidence that it brags in its keynotes about the hundreds of millions of customer accounts that it already has in its ecosystem. And Amazon is in a similar position, and is aready making noises about setting up its own payments system. At best, in the near future we can probably hope for a plethora of barely compatible systems that each have their own apps and all use the same readers at retail locations. Even if mobile payments finally take off, there are likely to be lots of competing solutions with overlapping functionality.

lundi 30 septembre 2013

Microsoft should buy BlackBerry. There, I said it

I'm not the only one who thinks so. Google the phrase, "Microsoft should buy BlackBerry". You'll see a lot of hits appear. And with good reason too—Microsoft should buy BlackBerry. It's a bargain of a deal and the technology is really good—so good that the government uses it. A lot of highly secure and data sensitive businesses use it: healthcare, security consultants, banks, and stock brokers. Why should Microsoft buy BlackBerry? There are plenty of good reasons but the best one is obvious: security.

It's no secret that security issues plague Android, Windows phones, and even iPhones but have you heard of any BlackBerry compromises? OK, there have been one or two over the past few years but nothing like their competitors.

So, if BlackBerry is so darn great, why is it available at a bargain price and yet no one seems to want it, especially consumers?

BlackBerry (fka RIM) had a few significant and unfortunate outages over the years and those outages left a lot of users cold. I was one of them. I loved my BlackBerry. To me, it was the best phone ever. No, it didn't have a lot of bells and whistles but it did what I needed for it to do: make phone calls, receive phone calls, receive alerts, respond to alerts, receive email, work with email, connect to the Internet, and stay secure while doing it all.

BlackBerry fell out of favor because of the outages and its visual appeal seemed to lag behind the iPhone. The iPhone was prettier and sleeker than my wide BlackBerry with the telescoping antenna. Then Android devices hit the market. It was one of those better mousetrap situations for BlackBerry. Although BlackBerry was the better mousetrap, its popularity waned due in part to its lack of aesthetic appeal. Envious BlackBerry users saw the cool swipey stuff and the ever-growing App Store and it was just too much for them. They'd rather switch than fight.

BlackBerry reminds me of another superior product that failed due to its lack of mass appeal and lack of marketing mojo: OS/2. Don't laugh. OS/2 was an awesome operating system that was far superior to its only real competitor at the time: Windows 3.x. I don't want to digress into a litany of defense of OS/2 but if you know anything about OS/2, you know that I'm right.

BlackBerry could help instill Microsoft into the Enterprise as a mobile provider. Right now, there is a mix of Windows phones, Android, and probably a minority of iPhones in corporate use. It seems that Apple sweeps consumer tech but not necessarily corporate tech. 

Businesses trust Microsoft. If you're an anti-Microsoft person, you can argue that point but I'm sorry but you're wrong. Businesses trust Microsoft because Microsoft is responsible. Who can you call when your Android device goes on the blink or when its security is compromised? The carrier? Nope. The device manufacturer? Maybe. Chances are good that you won't get very far either way.

Microsoft develops and supports the operating system. If there's a security breach, there's only one direction that you can point your finger to: Microsoft. They'll fix it too. And they don't rely on a community of disconnected but benevolent programmers to fix something.

Don't get me wrong. I think that open source or free software is great. I love Linux. I love Apache. I love OpenOffice.org. I love all things open source, free, GNU, etc. But, I'm also realistic. The reality is that corporations like Microsoft. You can't change that with any amount of foot-stomping, hand waving, or Guy Fawkes mask wearing. You'll never convince big companies that they should entrust their 99.999 percent uptime systems to anything but something that's corporate backed.

Red Hat has made inroads into the corporate world. SUSE has made some as well. But they're backed by corporations too. You'll find few, if any, big companies running Debian on mission-critical workloads. And before you kill the messenger, I love Debian. I love Ubuntu, which does have corporate support too, although for some reason, it hasn't really taken hold to a large extent in the U.S.

BlackBerry has government approval. It has the healthcare industry. It enjoys a large portion of the banking industry. It also is the mobile platform of choice for anyone who needs secure communications. Ask President Obama what kind of mobile device he uses. Well, of course it's a BlackBerry, otherwise it wouldn't be significant to mention it here. 

Many analysts besides myself have suggested that BlackBerry would be a smart purchase for Microsoft. They all have different reasons but the only meaningful one to me is to acquire the technology for the secure platform. Microsoft could use the technology, make the BlackBerry attractive again, and create a mobile device desired by businesses. They would have almost no legitimate competition in that realm.

BlackBerry's Security, Microsoft's interface, and a well-oiled marketing machine is just what the new CEO should order for the new Microberry device. Everyone will want one. It doesn't yet exist and I want one. President Obama will want one or two. How can you go wrong in that company?

What do you think? Should Microsoft buy BlackBerry? Or should BlackBerry just be buried? Talk back and let me know.

Related Stories: